1. Maybe he should actually do something a president should do.
   Oh, you mean like lowering taxes for the majority of the people?  Or maybe making sure that they are provided health care?  Actually, neither of those seem like the kind of things that our presidents have been doing.  I guess you're right on this one.
2. Obama is forcing health care on us!  We don't want to be treated well! (Okay, so maybe that's not a direct quote, but it's what they seem to be saying.)
   All I can think about when I hear this is how Michael Moore used his movie Sicko to promote the universal health care systems of Canada, the U.K., France, and Cuba and how bad it was that so many Americans didn't have health care and how it really touched our hearts to think that so many people in this country were going without the care they both needed and deserved.  But, seeing as I'm pretty sure even the conservatives of this country hate Michael Moore now, I guess that my point is no longer valid.
   
3. Obama is a communist!
   How?  Because he tries to make sure the people of this country are treated well and given the benefits that he believes they deserve?  The moment that you're a nuclear physicist making the same money as the corn farmer (which, by the way, we also have the same government controls over as before, I notice) then you can bring this up.  But, of course, if I try making this point, then you'll prolly just go back to the argument that you used during the primaries, which is that he's really a supporter/believer of the Islamic faith (having been born in Kenya and everything [see below.])  So I guess that I really can't win this point either.
4. Obama isn't even American!  He was born in Kenya!
   Well seeing as we've all seemingly agreed that a birth certificate isn't actual proof of anything, I guess I must succumb to this argument as well.
5. Obama doesn't even care about the troops!  He's on vacation on Memorial Day! (And, yes, these people do generally seem to shout this much.)
   Although he may technically be on vacation today, President Obama did give a remembrance speech at the Abraham Lincoln National Cemetery.  Not to mention the fact the Reagan and both Bush's took vacation on Memorial Day during their presidency.  But then H.W. Bush did visit with a few vets while on vacation in his favourite spot in Maine, and W. Bush had his vice president address the nation with a few words, and I'm pretty sure that Reagen was prolly told to go on vacation (to avoid him doing something dumb.)  Plus Obama delayed his speech because of a torrential downpour and a lightening storm.  Even I can't explain how the president would disrespect our fallen troops like this by doing something so stupid as caring for the safety of those who would attend his speech.  Not to mention the fact that I know that none of you would ever do something like have the day off of work on Memorial Day.  I guess that's another point for you Mr. Obama-Hater.

Con: Taylor Lautner appears much more in this one.
Pro: Robert Pattinson should be in this one less.

Con: Taylor Lautner is still way funny looking.
Pro: He cut that nasty looking hair of his to a length that far better suits him.

Con: Edward is still being portrayed by a "pretty boy" who used to be a model until he wasn't "girlish" enough and he actually became rather funny looking.  Emmett is also still being portrayed by an Abercrombie & Fitch model.
Pro: Ah, who am I kidding.  The pro's right there.  So many of these male characters are or at least look like they could be underwear models.  Grrr.

Con: Kristen Stewart.
Pro: Well... She was in Panic Room.  That doesn't necessarily mean anything in regards to this movie, but it raises your hope somewhat remembering that she was pretty good (going into diabetic shock) in such a great movie.

Con: The entire stroyline is, for a lack of a better word, stupid and doesn't seem like it was really thought out at all.  It portrays vampires as gay, pretty boys who are so romantic that they'll climb in through girls' windows and watch them for hours as they sleep.  Heck, even if we were okay with portraying vampires (the dark, undead creatures who rule the night and instill fear into the minds of anybody and everybody) as anything other than dark, undead creatures who rule the night and instill fear into the minds of anybody and everybody... Well, these character would still be insufficient at best.  Let's face it: when Edward is claiming that he's going to go in front of the Vatican and reveal himself, well there's no actual worry that everyone would be upset over seeing a vampire; they'd all be upset because they'd think that surely someone covered in that much glitter is homosexual, and that doesn't fly well in front of that many Catholics.
Pro: Ummm... Well, there's also... Uhhh... Yeah.